Woodruff Financial Planning blog

If you have read our previous post on comprehensive financial planning, you will have seen the basic principles on what makes a comprehensive financial plan. Well, this post aims to give you some reasons why you might want to consider making a financial plan.

It was well publicised last week that the Chancellor’s emergency budget raised capital gains tax for higher rate income tax payers from 18% to 28%.  However, trusts were also caught up in the changes, which has not yet received widespread notice.

How does capital gains tax work?
Capital gains tax is paid on the disposal of assets such as investment funds, and would affect you if you sell your investments, or switch funds within those investments.  Before the changes tax was levied at 18% of any gains over £10,100 per person, per tax year.

What are the changes?
From now on, this will remain the same if you are a basic rate income tax payer (20% rate).  If you are a higher rate income tax payer (40% or 50%), then capital gains tax will now be 28% on any gains above the £10,100 limit.

Our understanding is that if you are a basic rate tax payer and the capital gain takes you into the higher rate bracket, you will pay 28% tax on the excess which takes you above the higher rate limit.

Trusts
Trusts will also pay capital gains tax at the higher rate of 28%, and what’s more they will only have a tax-free allowance of £5,050 per tax year.  Trustees should pay particular care when making changes to their investment portfolios.

Here are the main details of the emergency budget, announced today.  We have commented on the implications to your personal finances.

• VAT – rises to 20%
  From January 4th 2011; this will increase the cost of goods;
• Income tax – raising the personal allowance by £1,000 from April
  A gain of up to £170 per year.  Higher rate income tax payers will not benefit from this change.

• Capital gains tax rises – to 28% for higher earners
  Basic rate earners remain at 18%; no return to taper relief or indexation relief.  This does help to keep things simple;
• Tax credits – reducing benefits to those earning over £40,000
  The government seeks to apply these to ‘those with most need.’
• Employer’s National Insurance – threshold to rise
  This means employers will pay slightly less tax

• Corporation tax – reduced
  Large companies cut from 28% to 24% over 4 years, and small companies to 20%
• Bank levy
  No details as yet, although France & Germany agree to follow suit;

• £30 billion reduction in spending by Government departments
• Capital expenditure on Government to remain level
  This should help businesses and employers to retain contracts and work;
• Public sector wages – 2 year pay freeze for those earning over £21,000
  Those below this amount will receive a £250 pay rise each year.
• Public sector pensions – A review into costs and benefits
  These were set to double in cost over 5 years.
• Pensions – phasing out the compulsory retirement age
  This will help with flexible retirement planning, a real necessity to modern lives.
• Pensions – bringing forward the proposed raising of the retirement age
  We will have to retire later than many expected, claiming our State pension later;
• Pensions – no forced annuity purchase at age 75
  This is a good move, since it will promote more flexibility with pensions planning.  Details are set to follow.
• State Pensions – rising in line with earnings, or 2.5% from April 2011
• Child benefit – frozen for 3 years
  The Government has kept the benefit open to all, but reduced the benefit in real terms.
• Disability living allowance – medical required
  It will be harder to claim this benefit
• Housing benefit – lower limits
  There will be restrictions on the amounts payable
• Alcohol and cigarettes – no changes
• Incentives for new business set ups outside of the South East
  1st 10 employees will save on Employer’s National Insurance

Here is our summary of today’s budget.  This is not designed as a comprehensive list of the areas covered, but rather a commentary on the financial implications.

Stamp Duty
Stamp duty below £250,000 has been abolished for 1st time buyers from midnight tonight. 90% of first time buyers won’t pay stamp duty. This applies for this tax year and next tax year only.

But for properties over a £1million, stamp duty will rise to 5% (from 4%). Mind you, that’s a whopping £50,000 tax on such a property purchase!

Entrepreneurs relief
Good news if you own a business – entrepreneurs relief has been doubled to £2 million.  This means that you only pay 10% tax on the profits from the sale of your business, rather than 18%.

ISAs
As previously announced, maximum allowable tax-free ISA contributions are to be £10,200 from April (for everyone).  These limits will increase by inflation each year in future.

Income tax, national insurance, VAT, capital gains tax
No changes not already announced.  Obviously, the 50% tax on earnings over £150,000 has already been announced.

Tax relief on pensions
Confirmation of previously announced restrictions on tax relief on pensions, which affect top earners.  See here.

Public sector pensions
Reforms will be made to cut the pensions bill, which sounds ominous if you work for the state…

Freezing of inheritance tax thresholds
For a further 4 years, which effectively means a slight tax increase as assets (hopefully) increase in value.

Mortgages
HMRC is to open discussions with mortgage lenders on the formal introduction of an income verification service.  We are unsure how this would work in practice as this data is out of date by its nature for the self-employed by at least 9 months.

Fuel duty rises
Next month’s planned 3p increase in fuel duty will be staged to soften the blow. It will go up by 1p in April, another 1p in October and a final 1p in January 2011.

Bank bonuses
An extra tax on bank bonuses has already been announced.  The 50% extra tax has raised £2 billion (twice as much as predicted).

Tax evasion
The Government will be harsher on those caught evading tax offshore. They expect to raise up to £500 million per year.  Those caught will be fined up to 200% of the tax evaded.

Housing benefit
To be cut back for expensive properties.

Basic bank accounts
Everyone will be guaranteed access to a bank account – surely a necessity of modern life?

This post is designed to do 2 things.  Firstly, we’ll give you a brief overview of the tax relief regime for pension contributions. Secondly, we’ll give some commentary as to where this is going politically.

How does pension tax relief work?
The tax relief on pensions is one of the things that makes them so attractive.  In short, if you make personal contributions to a registered pension scheme, the Government will give you some of your income tax back.

For for every £100 gross pension contribution, you only actually pay £80 net (out of your bank account or wages).  The Government tops up the other 20% (based on the current income tax rate).  Therefore, for a £100 per month contribution from your wages, your pension fund will actually receive £125 – an uplift of 25%.  Now what other investment can guarantee this kind of growth on day one?  This tax relief is a big reason why pensions are a good way to save for the long-term (although there are some restrictions on them as well).

Higher rate income tax payers
For higher rate income tax payers, you pay income tax at 40%.  You can reclaim the further 20% tax (the difference between the higher and basic rates).  Therefore, for your £100 gross contribution, you would pay in £80 net from your account or wages, and then reclaim the remaining £20 through your tax return.  Thus, if you pay in £100 from your wages, £125 goes into your pension pot, and you get £25 back as well through your tax return.

All this adds up to a significant benefit for all savers, but particularly higher rate tax payers.

Limits
You are allowed to pay in up 100% of your earned income, or £3,600pa gross, whichever is the greater.  This means that low earners or non-earners (including children) can pay into a pension plan, and event receive contributions from a third party (say a partner or parent), and still claim tax relief.

From April 2010 the maximum allowed to be paid into a pension plan and still attract tax relief is £255,000.

Political changes
Obviously, we are nearing an election and have a massive public deficit.  Therefore, the Government is trying to do 2 things: to demonstrate a clear difference between themselves and the Opposition; and to reduce the burden on the public finances of a benefit which seems to be delivered to those who least need it – i.e. higher earners.

The Government recently announced it would introduce a new income tax rate for earners over £150,000 at 50%, effective from April 2011.  This would have increased the tax relief payable to such earners, so they also brought in complicated measures to stop this.  The restrictions apply to all contributions for such high earners, including those made by employers, and they are also seeking to stop people from making massive contributions this tax year to pre-empt the changes next year (the anti-forestalling measures).  For more information see this link to the Pensions Advisory Service website.  The measures will reduce the tax relief available to earners over £150,000 so that relief will be tapered away to that payable to basic rate tax payers for contributions for earners over £180,000.  If you earn over £150,000 and you already make significant contributions to your pension, you will not be penalised so long as you can demonstrate a pattern in your pension contributions of no more than £20,000pa; those looking to pay in extra in the short-term will be penalised.

Clear?  That’s what we thought!  The easy answer is to seek guidance from us if you think you may be caught in the new rules.

Pension tax relief in figures
Let’s look at some of the sums involved, courtesy of a recent article in the Economist and another in Citywire.

• The current tax relief regime costs £28.4 billion, or 2% of GDP
• 25% of this figure goes to the richest 1% of the working population
• Abolishing tax relief on higher rate contributions could save the state £10 billion per year.

These are significant figures, and we actually do think that some reform of pension tax relief is needed, although we could not support the proposed changes.  These changes are far too complex and probably will not have the results that the Government want.  We can see that many high earners, already disenchanted with pensions, will be put off pensions altogether.  This may result in less take up of pensions, and less roll-out to the lower paid workforce in general.  Of course, many higher earners also retain professional advisers, which will see them look to alternative arrangements (such as EFRBs) to obtain an advantage.

We would prefer to see a simplfied system of tax relief on pensions.  Why not apply a level rate applicable to all earners, with a top limit on contributions?  This seems the fairest way, and does not discriminate against basic rate tax payers.  We realise that many people (including some clients) would not support this, but we see it as strange to give the biggest benefits to those who can most afford them.  Why not simply offer everyone the same level of tax relief, and those who save more will get a greater benefit?

See our pensions section of our website.

Today, I met with a new client.  He is approaching 60 and has been running professional practice for some years.  He is now considering retirement.

We started off by discussing his pensions, and other assets, as well has his income sources for the future.  However, it quickly became clear to me that what he really needs at the moment is to know if he can be confident to retire; after all, this is a big decision.  Once he gives up his professional practice, his income will be limited, although he can always work as a consultant.

What we spoke to him about was the concept of comprehensive financial planning.

We will begin by analysing his future goals, income, expenses, assets etc, and then put these all together to work out whether he can be confident to retire now, or whether he will need to work for a few more years to build up more resources.  This is a big decision, so needs to be taken with his eyes wide open.  Out philosophy is that it is better to know the real value of your money and assets so that you can enter retirement confident that you can be financially secure; if this is not the case, then we can start to work on what will achive your goals.

We will be able to paint a picture of his retirement as if he had retired yesterday.  If his resources are not enough, we can start to look at other options by examining different scenarios, such as retiring later, spending less money, working part time, downsizing his home etc.  After all, these decisions need some careful planning.

Once this has been done, we can agree a strategy to best meet his needs, and this will result in some major changes to his current financial situation: taking pension income, amending investments to focus on income rather than capital growth, and possibly the sale of his home.  We will work closely with his accountant as there will be other issues raised by the exit from his business.

We find this a rewarding process in that we are actually helping the client to realise his ambition to retire on enough income to achieve his future desired lifestyle.  from the client’s point of view, this is not about financial products, but more about financial planning to give him the confidence to stop accumulating and start spending.

See out Financial Navigation service for more details.

We have just published our latest financial planning newsletter.

Click here to view the newsletter.

According to a recent ICM poll, conducted for Aviva (see here), less than half of consumers would be willing to pay any sort of fees for financial advice.  We think that this kind of survey is misleading since in our experience people will pay for advice if they can be shown value for what they are receiving.

This goes to the heart of the commission versus fees debate.  Most UK financial advisers get paid by commission, although some may tell you that their advice is ‘free’. If they do, don’t believe them because getting paid by commission does not mean free.  Commission is paid for through the charges of the product.

We charge you for our time, advice, research and expertise just like any other professional service. We believe that commission creates an inherent conflict of interest between your and our interests, as this payment method is intended to encourage use of certain product providers over others. After all, if your garage was paid only if they sold you a new part on your car, rather than for the service, do you think they would sell you a new part each time? Of course they would because that is how they would get paid; and they would certainly be more likely to recommend the most profitable part for them rather than you.

We work on a fixed fee basis, so that you can be sure of the cost to you, regardless of how long the work takes.

Click here to see how we charge for our advice.

One of the unique pitfalls of financial planning is suddenly coming into money.  This might affect you if you fall into the following categories:

• Sale of a business
• Inheritance
• Divorce
• Critical illness
• Windfalls (e.g. lottery win)
• Ultimate high earners

It may surprise you to think of it, but sudden wealth can be negative as well as positive.  Some commentators have described this as ‘affluenza’ as the responsibility of the extra wealth can lead people to suffer from stress as a result of managing the assets.

Click here to download our factsheet on sudden wealth.

Unsurprisingly, we can help.  We have a service which directly resolves all the issues people face when they come into money – the Portfolio Management Service.